Bandit Alley

GENERAL MOTORCYCLE FORUMS => GENERAL MOTORCYCLE => Topic started by: PitterB4 on January 26, 2006, 08:23:52 AM

Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: PitterB4 on January 26, 2006, 08:23:52 AM
I'm sure that petitions like this have little to no impact.  I also know some of you have seen this already (I clicked on only one random page of signatures and happened to see our very own Red01's sig!  :wink: ).  But, throwing in my $.02 made me feel better!  I like this time of year when they have the Barrett-Jackson auction.  I certainly would like to see more coverage of MotoGP and AMA racing.  I actually really like Paul's suggestion of a second, NASCAR-free network.

Petition to increase non-NASCAR programming on SpeedTV (http://www.petitiononline.com/SpdTV/petition.html)
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: Sven on January 26, 2006, 08:46:38 AM
Too bad they spelled it "Motorcylce"
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: land_shark on January 26, 2006, 11:27:49 AM
I signed the HELL out of that petition!!!! :soapbox:  

"Wow, man.  You really like Tide..."  - the late Mitch Hedberg
:gatlin NASCAR
Title: Re: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: jwalters on January 26, 2006, 12:01:46 PM
We must have crashed it with all our signatures... b/c I am getting an internal server error, when I try to submit my name. :-)
-j
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: chevsuz12 on January 26, 2006, 01:51:47 PM
worked for me.
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: jwalters on January 26, 2006, 02:33:17 PM
Yep, worked for me too, it must have hiccuped when I tried earlier.  10451 signatures!
Title: speed
Post by: tacoman on January 26, 2006, 02:50:34 PM
Just signed it.  It seems that I've noticed some change.  A few months back everytime I turned it on there was NASCAR stuff.  I've noticed more car shows, old movies, and bike racing.  I was home with my ill daughter on a tuesday and all kinds of cool stuff during the day.  Supercross, some enduro coverage, Canadian motocross, Supermotard, and the usual 2 wheel tuesday stuff.  I realize the general population is into NASCAR and their advertisers pay the bills, but a day dedicated to bikes (2 wheel Tuesday) is great. Heck, the big 4 advertise like mad.  In the day of TIVO etc., time of programming is not that big of deal.
Title: Re: speed
Post by: Sven on January 26, 2006, 03:03:29 PM
Quote from: "tacoman"
In the day of TIVO etc., time of programming is not that big of deal.


Yeah, I had set "motorcycle racing" up on Tivo and I think they are running 4 events on Tuesday and repeating them at other times during the week....more than I can keep up with, but since it's not live, it hardly matters when they run it, or when I watch it.
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: jwalters on January 26, 2006, 03:08:14 PM
The hard truth is, this country is NASCAR crazy.  I am not, but its amazing how big its become in the past few years.  I guess, I can't blame SpeedTV for capitalizing on, arguably, the largest sports market in the USA.  

My beef with their coverage is how they seem to ram NASCAR down our throats.  They have back to back to back NASCAR shows on TV.  Many times repeating the EXACT same show from just a few hours prior.  

Now its getting even worse.  They are covering the off season practises! WTF?  Come SpeedTV, even the NFL and NBA have offseasons, can't we have an off season from NASCAR..... PLEASE!  

During this time off from all the left hand turning, I would love to see more two wheeled coverage, SCCA or collector car shows, hell even some Monster truck now and then!  

Most motorcyclist get the "wrenching bug" over the winter, so how about a motorcycle version of "Shade Tree Mechanic" that shows real motorcycle owners with real bikes performing real maintenance such as clutch plate swaps, carb cleaning, throttle body sync, bore kit installation, timing adjustment, valve adjustment, track day preperation, etc,

That would be a show, I would tune in for!
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: choppa on January 31, 2006, 09:44:20 PM
it seems that speedtv is getting away from their two wheeled tues and are shoving nascar down our throats so maybe they should just have a two wheeled-two hours a day? thats all most of us have time for anyway...
Title: tv
Post by: tacoman on February 01, 2006, 01:48:45 PM
I personally don't get the whole NASCAR thing.  They're trying to build a track here (Wash state) and are trying to push all the economic benefits.  Something to the tune of a typical NASCAR fan spends over $1,000 on a big race weekend.  Of course, they want the taxpayers to foot half the bill.  They claim two big race weekends per year will pay all the bills.  Great, what happens if its a rain out (a more than likely possibility here).
Oh well, its big.  My little cousin is 16 and she can name all the drivers (the young, hunky ones).  I saw the Hayden brothers in people magazine in the "sexiest brothers" write up so motorcycling will become more mainstream soon.
Title: Re: tv
Post by: jwalters on February 01, 2006, 01:52:43 PM
I don't get names like Tacoman? :lol: But I agree with you.  The only positve, I've seen lately is happening in our backyard, Newton, Iowa.  There they are building a large NASCAR oval track, first of its kinda in Iowa, and one of a few in the midwest.  The plus side is, the oval also has supporting tracks, including a few road courses which are suppose to have an AMA superbike event in 2007.  I can't say for sure, but I'd imagine the road course would make it on its own.  So I guess there is a trick-down effect as racing, in general, becomes more popular. These large NASCAR events make it fesieble to build a track in the middle of Iowa!
http://www.iowaspeedway.com

-j

Quote from: "tacoman"
I personally don't get the whole NASCAR thing.  They're trying to build a track here (Wash state) and are trying to push all the economic benefits.  Something to the tune of a typical NASCAR fan spends over $1,000 on a big race weekend.  Of course, they want the taxpayers to foot half the bill.  They claim two big race weekends per year will pay all the bills.  Great, what happens if its a rain out (a more than likely possibility here).
Oh well, its big.  My little cousin is 16 and she can name all the drivers (the young, hunky ones).  I saw the Hayden brothers in people magazine in the "sexiest brothers" write up so motorcycling will become more mainstream soon.
Title: Re: tv
Post by: Red01 on February 01, 2006, 08:18:48 PM
Quote from: "tacoman"
They claim two big race weekends per year will pay all the bills.  Great, what happens if its a rain out (a more than likely possibility here).


Those NASCAR pansies - no racing in the rain? What's up with that?
It has to be raining pretty darn hard for them to call a roadrace (F1, AMA, MotoGP)... It always amazes me that those MotoGP guys are still doin' 300 KPH or more in the rain... seems it barely even slows them down.
Title: track
Post by: tacoman on February 02, 2006, 01:12:20 PM
A track would be cool, I got thinking more and we would probably get some motorcycle events.  We have Pacific Raceways but its more of an amateur venue.  The problem is the site.  Its typical Western Washington mentality, build and worry about roads later.  I think just north of Portland would be best, lots of empty space and I5 is right there.  Right now the Sonics basketball team are threatening to leave if we don't cough up a quarter billion (yes, billion) to redo their arena.  Personally, I'd take Nascar over basketball.
Title: Re: tv
Post by: jwalters on February 02, 2006, 01:19:25 PM
I hear ya Paul.  I never understood why those F1 cars needed those blinky red lights on their tail until I saw them race in the rain!

Quote from: "Red01"

Those NASCAR pansies - no racing in the rain? What's up with that?
It has to be raining pretty darn hard for them to call a roadrace (F1, AMA, MotoGP)... It always amazes me that those MotoGP guys are still doin' 300 KPH or more in the rain... seems it barely even slows them down.
Title: Re: track
Post by: Red01 on February 02, 2006, 08:31:17 PM
Quote from: "tacoman"
Right now the Sonics basketball team are threatening to leave if we don't cough up a quarter billion (yes, billion) to redo their arena.  Personally, I'd take Nascar over basketball.


AGAIN? Didn't they just overhaul the Collesium into the Key Arena a few years ago on the taxpayers dime?

I say (http://www.sport-touring.net/forums/images/smilies/twofinger.gif) screw any and every sport that needs taxpayer support. If the sport is profitable, then the owners can build their own damn stadium, field, course, track, etc. And then they're free to charge whatever they want to rent out their space for other activities when they aren't using it.
Title: Re: track
Post by: jwalters on February 02, 2006, 09:14:39 PM
Here is a CRAZY idea, reduce the salaries of every player in the NBA by 2% for additional funding...  I know it would never fly, but hell, I'd be up for a 75% cut.  That way it would cut UNIQUE Whip's business enough to stop airing that damn show.  

"Look, we made a speaker box, and bolted on some new wheels, that don't help performance....COOL!"  And talk about being a dick to his employees,  I've watched it enough to wonder why Reme doesn't jack him in the face and leave.  That fat f*#k can't even bend over to put on a wheel, yet bitches at everyone else. :wtf:


Quote from: "Red01"
Quote from: "tacoman"
Right now the Sonics basketball team are threatening to leave if we don't cough up a quarter billion (yes, billion) to redo their arena.  Personally, I'd take Nascar over basketball.


AGAIN? Didn't they just overhaul the Collesium into the Key Arena a few years ago on the taxpayers dime?

I say (http://www.sport-touring.net/forums/images/smilies/twofinger.gif) screw any and every sport that needs taxpayer support. If the sport is profitable, then the owners can build their own damn stadium, field, course, track, etc. And then they're free to charge whatever they want to rent out their space for other activities when they aren't using it.
Title: sonics
Post by: tacoman on February 03, 2006, 02:32:11 PM
What bugs me, apart from overpaid athletes, is the way the owner Howard Schulz is going about this.  To get any type of taxpayer dollars its got to go thru the legislature.  The current session is half over and he brings it up now.  What does he have to offer for a team?  Losing record, on their 2nd coach of the season, an NBA high 55% vacancy on luxury boxes and low ticket sales.  Also, everyone has Seahawks on the brain and aren't thinking of basketball.  Again, I'm not much of a basketball fan so I say go ahead and go!
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: Red01 on February 03, 2006, 09:22:20 PM
I'd say go ahead and go to any team that says, "Buy us a new place or we're leaving!" - Even if they're champs.
Title: More Bikes less NASCAR on Speed?
Post by: Red01 on February 04, 2006, 02:37:19 AM
Back on the subject of NASCAR...

What does Pink Floyd have in common with Dale Earnhardt?





































Their last big hit was The Wall.
 :duh: