Bandit Alley
GENERAL MOTORCYCLE FORUMS => GENERAL MOTORCYCLE => Topic started by: Tarheel_Rider on June 10, 2007, 08:48:24 AM
-
Just got my Motorcyclist rag in the mail and they ran a comparison between the Bandit and K12R Sport. The BMW wins on the drag strip and for technology gadetry and not much else.
The conclusion "For everybody else, the most significant twist is how close the Bandit comes to delivering filet mignon for the price of flank steak . . . the Bandit delivers more motorcycle for less money than anything in anybody else's showroom."
If the press generates sales, the Bandit should be an all time winner, every article I read is glowing positive. So far in the rags I've spotted, it's beaten the FZ1, and the K12R Sport (twice).
Saving my pennies, of course, by the time I get them saved, who knows what else will be out there, but the Bandit looks like the real deal.
-
Listen to your fellow B1250 riders here- We love them!
A good report from the May 07 Motorcyclist sold me enough to make me research it, then log on here, then go sit on one...then bought it. I am new to motorcyle ownership- but I have ridden a few- and I think I bought the best bike, that I could, for less than 8,000 bucks!
-
Just got my Motorcyclist rag in the mail and they ran a comparison between the Bandit and K12R Sport. The BMW wins on the drag strip and for technology gadetry and not much else.
The conclusion "For everybody else, the most significant twist is how close the Bandit comes to delivering filet mignon for the price of flank steak . . . the Bandit delivers more motorcycle for less money than anything in anybody else's showroom."
If the press generates sales, the Bandit should be an all time winner, every article I read is glowing positive. So far in the rags I've spotted, it's beaten the FZ1, and the K12R Sport (twice).
Saving my pennies, of course, by the time I get them saved, who knows what else will be out there, but the Bandit looks like the real deal.
Heh! The K12R Sport Beemer makes 109 bhp. Dunno if this is shaft or RWHP, but I KNOW that at least one '99 Bandit makes 111.4 dyno'ed RWHP. Might be a close race, eh? Now lookit the prices for both bikes. No Contest!
Herb
-
I have a friend that has a brand new Bandit too and he has a little shop that he does all his work in. He did a "tweek" tune and put new "two brothers" exhaust on it and said that it dyno'ed at 115 RWHP... Your are right if those numbers are correct. Might be a better race than BMW would give the Bandit credit for...Banditone1250s... :taz:
-
For the price difference between the bikes, the Bandit could probably be making 200+Hp :bandit:
-
I have a friend that has a brand new Bandit too and he has a little shop that he does all his work in. He did a "tweek" tune and put new "two brothers" exhaust on it and said that it dyno'ed at 115 RWHP... Your are right if those numbers are correct. Might be a better race than BMW would give the Bandit credit for...Banditone1250s... :taz:
To be perfectly honest, I don't care an iota about which bike has more HP whether at the crank or the rear wheel. These figures are just academic and only worth discussing over a drink with your friends in the local bar. Power output is just one aspect of what makes a bike good (though torque and the shape of the torque curve is probably far more important in a real world scenario) - weight, size, handling, ergonomics, comfort etc. all play a big role and, not least of all, the skill of the rider.
To me, bike riding is not about comparing one bike with another on a dragstrip. It's about the amount of enjoyment that might be extracted from actually riding the bike on a variety of roads under a range of conditions. Of course, some people might get more pleasure talking about HP in the local bar but that's just bragging, not riding.
-
SteelD - it all depends on the rider. One person cares about the torque- other wanna blaze a trail with their hair on fire- then there are those like me that want something that does both well. This is most of us...if we were one of those other mindsets, we'd have cruisers or gsxr1000's. A Bandit that makes 80 lt lbs, but only 75 hp, wouldn't be near the fun that our 80 lt lbs/ 100+ hp is.;)
Horsepower is always good as long as you don't sacrifice the tq to get it. I am willing to bet the a pipe and tune would boost both.
-
I agree totally. Alot of people in the US agree with you too. This is why the v-twin is the motorcycle engine of choice. Torque is a good thing. There are photo's of a sport bike with a 3-cylinder diesel engine from a VW Lupo which would be a beast if the company hadn't gone out of business. I had bought a KLR with the hopes of dropping in the diesel military engine in it at some point. The bike was NOT comfortable for me...and I got rid of it. My previous bike was an FZ6. I dumped that after 4 months. Something about the way I fit on the bike didn't work and I didn't enjoy revving the engine into the stratosphere every time I needed to get going in a hurry. I found myself riding my wife's bike all the time at that point...it was more comfortable, sounded better and had much more mid-range grunt.
-
All the reviews I've read on the Bandit (and I've read everyone I can get my hands on) mention the handlebar as an issue. In Motorcyclist they say "Average-sized riders will be happy with the Bandit's sensibly upright ergos, with the notable exception of an awkward upward kink in the relatively narrow handlebar we grew to hate. Tall types may wish for for more room between the seat and said handlebar."
Other rags say, just swap out the handlebar, but they don't mention any suggestions for what to replace it with. Way ahead of my headlights here, but wondering if you early adopters have had the same issue and/or if you have replacement bar suggestions?
Joel
-
I don't know what reviews you've read but on the UK side of the pond, nobody has complained about the bars. They tend to complain about the seat if anything.
I have no problem with my bars so far and a lot depends on what you are used to - if you come from a race rep. they will be too high. If you come from a cruiser they will be too low.
I wouldn't worry about it myself. Get it and use it and if after a period you decide you don't like them then they can easily be swapped out. What pleases me may not please you and vice versa so it's really a case of trying it out. If all the reviews can find to complain about are the bars and seat then it says a lot for the rest of the bike. It's a peach.
-
I don't know what reviews you've read but on the UK side of the pond, nobody has complained about the bars. They tend to complain about the seat if anything.
I have no problem with my bars so far and a lot depends on what you are used to - if you come from a race rep. they will be too high. If you come from a cruiser they will be too low.
I wouldn't worry about it myself. Get it and use it and if after a period you decide you don't like them then they can easily be swapped out. What pleases me may not please you and vice versa so it's really a case of trying it out. If all the reviews can find to complain about are the bars and seat then it says a lot for the rest of the bike. It's a peach.
Well said, that is the truth.
I thought Cycle World had the same comment on the bars but when I reread the article, it mentioned something called "clakity-clack twistgrip" - whatever that is. It compared the Bandit to the FZ1 and CW's conclusion "If you have an eye for cutting-edge style or lean more toward a supersport without the lower back pain, then the FZ1 is the bike for you. If, however, you thirst for real-world power, classic style, refinemnt and broader versatility, Suzuki's Bandit is the one."
-
it mentioned something called "clakity-clack twistgrip" - whatever that is.
The throttle tube had too much slop on the bar.
Since no one else has mentioned this - in the press or from our owners, I suspect this is a defect to that particular bike.
-
And remember, before you change handlebars (if the stock ones do actually bother you) try rotating the bars forward and bachwards first. This really changes the angle of your wrists and you may find that a simple change is all that is required.
Also remember to adjust the levers so that they are in line with your arms, so that your fingers don't need to reach "up" or "down" in your normal riding position.
-
I do have a little issue with the bars. I have Carpel Tunnel in both wrists, so I am pretty particular about the way my hand rest on the bars. I have tried moving the bars back and it made things a little better, but I still have an issue with it. I have another set of bars that I am going to try. They have a little bit lower rise than the ones on the Bandit now, and they have a little differant angle on the grips.
Rider also mentioned the bars in their review. The bandit was also in the running for Rider's Motorcycle of the Year in Rider. I have been very happy with the bike. Great bike for the money.
-
I don't know what reviews you've read but on the UK side of the pond, nobody has complained about the bars. They tend to complain about the seat if anything.
I have no problem with my bars so far and a lot depends on what you are used to - if you come from a race rep. they will be too high. If you come from a cruiser they will be too low.
I wouldn't worry about it myself. Get it and use it and if after a period you decide you don't like them then they can easily be swapped out. What pleases me may not please you and vice versa so it's really a case of trying it out. If all the reviews can find to complain about are the bars and seat then it says a lot for the rest of the bike. It's a peach.
Agreed. No 2 people have identical preferences when it comes to making a bike their own.
For example, I put on a set of bars intended for the GS-1150 because I installed a tall windshield in place of the "S" fairing (got tired of eating bugs, dirt & rocks). This change put too much weight on the wrists (no more wind pushing me back). I got this bar fitted without replacing any of the brake lines EXCEPT for the short one between the front brake cylinder and the Y connection.
I really wanted to put on a "Superbar", but then I'd have had to replace all the hydraulic lines (too many $). I have the Suzuki gel seat too, but this returned close to zero improvement. Must be the shape and location that makes the Bandit seat do what it does. If anyone has lowered the seat height substantially, I'd like to have your opinion on whether or not it's an improvement. By the way, I'm 6'-2", so inseam height is not MY problem.
A further effort to make the bike more comfy on long rides had me mounting a set of folding footpegs on top of the Suzuki case guards. The occasional change of leg position makes much more difference in comfort than the gel seat ever did. With this setup, I can go a complete tankful without stopping to stretch & walk around.
When the temps hit 90+, I found out that sitting on the "hump" in the middle of the seat helps me out. Slide back and try it when you get "numb-butt" or "monkey-butt".
In the meantime, get out and ride every chance you get. Practice makes perfect, as doctors say. :motorsmile:
Herb
-
right on that one. when I bought my B12 it seemed like it was set up like a dirt bike.
Just lower than a little and they are a little closer back too.
I have a set of gold Renthalls. A little wider & a little more back than stock. Being wider that catch a little more ait, good leverage tho. They good too.
1998 Red B12
57 k miles
And remember, before you change handlebars (if the stock ones do actually bother you) try rotating the bars forward and bachwards first. This really changes the angle of your wrists and you may find that a simple change is all that is required.
Also remember to adjust the levers so that they are in line with your arms, so that your fingers don't need to reach "up" or "down" in your normal riding position.
-
And then the BMW crowd has a different opinion of the test. It must come from justifying spending $7K more than the Bandit 1250.
http://www.i-bmw.com/showthread.php?t=8707
-
Well never driven a BMW bike- I would see it as their cars...high dollar but the much cheaper car would do everything as good but cheaper. The new GTO comes to mind...and they bashed the GTO too(BMW fans that is). I am more than satisfied with my bike- I don't want or need all the gadgetry that is gonna fail one day.
-
And then the BMW crowd has a different opinion of the test. It must come from justifying spending $7K more than the Bandit 1250.
http://www.i-bmw.com/showthread.php?t=8707
That right there was funny! Maybe it's not so much that the addition of a fairing to their beloved K1200R made the bike suck, but that the new 1250 Bandit really is a good bike.
This comment REALLY cracked me up: :toofunny:
cant get heated grips...
Yeah, I'm gonna spend almost double for the K12 over the B12.5 just so I can spend another $235 MORE to get optional heated grips.
Or you can buy whatever bike you want and install your own heated grips for $30 - $80 depending on if you want a 2-position switch or a variable controller.
Hmmm... :duh:
-
And the quickest way to have your nice BMW dealership try to void part of your BMW motorcycle's warranty is to not install THEIR doo-dads....
-
...not in the USA. If they give you any crap, just mention the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. (http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/buspubs/warranty.shtm)
-
From what I've heard...especially with electricals, BMW scoffs at that act...you can fight it of course and have that act on your side but it stops being worth fighting after a while which is is how BMW still prevails.
-
You're right on it being a hassle to fight them over it, but the burden of proof your mods caused the problem you're claiming warranty on relies on them.
If they're really that anal, and I'll take your word since I have no experience, I guess it's just another reason not to buy one.
-
From what I've heard...especially with electricals, BMW scoffs at that act...you can fight it of course and have that act on your side but it stops being worth fighting after a while which is is how BMW still prevails.
The reason is their high tech CanBus system which can easily be upset if you install non-approved accessories. That's why the BMW forums are awash with posts of what add-ons need what ballast resistors and so on to make the electronics think that nothing has gone wrong. With the CanBus system, if a circuit detects a higher or lower current draw than what it expects, it has 'intelligence' that says that there must be a problem and it shuts down that part of the circuit. So, it's too clever for its own good which is why BMW get a bit off-hand if you install something non-BMW and then go back and complain that something else has stopped working and want it fixed under warranty.
-
How does one compare, objectively, an air-cooled dinosaur and state of the art wizardry.
thats my favorite quote off that BMW forum. Maybe we should all just face it, and get the bike we want (can afford) and realize that in reality we can never really compare things.
Clearly the new 1250 is neither air cooled OR a dinosaur.
Buying a bike for the heated grips is like buying a car because it has one more cup holder. :duh:
i love the bandits anyway :motorsmile:
-
How does one compare, objectively, an air-cooled dinosaur and state of the art wizardry.
thats my favorite quote off that BMW forum.
Is that a comparison of the air/oil cooled boxer twin with a state-of-the-art watercooled in-line four from Suzuki? :wink:
-
The K1200R that was tested is not air cooled. It's a transverse inline four cylinder that leans the cylinders forward about 45 degrees or so. I believe it was a new engine last year or the year before. It's not the inline four that was laid on it's side like the older K bikes.
-
Sorry, my fault. I was being a little facetious by suggesting that BMW also have 'old' air/cooled designs in their range.
So, in that article, what were they referring to as an 'air-cooled dinosaur' 'cos that's definitely what the B1250 isn't. Maybe they didn't see that through their rose-tinted spectacles.
-
So, in that article, what were they referring to as an 'air-cooled dinosaur' 'cos that's definitely what the B1250 isn't. Maybe they didn't see that through their rose-tinted spectacles.
More likely their noses were in the way. :lol:
-
No offense taken. I sort of like the R series Beemers. One of the newer ones makes 109 HP, and the torque is probably around Bandit range too. Of course, you could probably buy two Bandits instead of one Beemer.
-
The K-series BMW's don't do much for me. I love the Boxers. They're not the fastest, most powerful, best handling, and certainly not the highest-tech bikes out there. But they are unique, and have a certain mystique.
I've been lusting after one of these since I first saw one... tell me this bike isn't just drop-dead COOL:
(http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q13/ZenMan33/BMWbc1.jpg)
And when I get too old and decrepit for my Bandit, no Gold Wing for me. I'll probably save up and go for the tried and true "old reliable" long-distance comfort machine with style:
(http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q13/ZenMan33/R1200RTl.jpg)
-
That is cool. It's not a factory bike, is it?
-
That is cool. It's not a factory bike, is it?
No, it's a '05 Boxer Cup Replica, Randy Mamola Edition. There's still a few low-mile models out there to be found, nice ones go for about $10K.
-
I like BMW bikes too and have nothing against them. However, with some BMW riders, brand loyalty becomes brand snobbery when, in reality, BMW bikes are no better and no worse than any other make of bike. They have had quality issues, breakdowns, part failures and corrosion issues. They aren't perfect though some of their riders seem to think they are.
We live in a world of choice, but whatever we choose to ride as bikers, we should stick together as one community that enjoys the freedom of motorcycling and not perpetrate the snobbery associated with specific brand ownership.
-
Sorry, my fault. I was being a little facetious by suggesting that BMW also have 'old' air/cooled designs in their range.
So, in that article, what were they referring to as an 'air-cooled dinosaur' 'cos that's definitely what the B1250 isn't. Maybe they didn't see that through their rose-tinted spectacles.
The K is BMW's state of the art showcase "we have arrived" bike.
It was a very well done article though. The general consensus I kind of got from both riders was that the Bandit was not necessarily better than the K, unless you factored in the price difference.
It appears the new Bandit still leads in best value for the buck!
-
The K is BMW's state of the art showcase "we have arrived" bike.
It appears the new Bandit still leads in best value for the buck!
I quite agree. The K Series bikes are fantastic state-of-the-art machines and probably could easily beat the 1250 in terms of equipment, dynamics, comfort, handling, and outright performance. However, all that comes at a price - I can buy two B1250s for the price of one K bike.
Unfortunately, a lot of magazines are only interested in absolute terms of one being better than another - they don't buy their own bikes after all. As you say, the Bandit delivers the biggest bang for the buck.