Bandit Alley

GENERAL MOTORCYCLE FORUMS => GENERAL MOTORCYCLE => Topic started by: curiousmike on March 30, 2006, 05:54:18 PM

Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: curiousmike on March 30, 2006, 05:54:18 PM
Is there a good overview of the diffs between the revisions ?

motor / weight / frame/ clocks / brakes / base HP diffs ?
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: GaryB12VA on March 30, 2006, 06:21:43 PM
This is one of the best comparo's I've seen between 1st and 2nd Generation Bandits. Not too technical but a good comparison. This article was one of the reasons I traded my 2000 Bandit for the 2002.

http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mcsuz/01b12.html
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: curiousmike on March 30, 2006, 07:51:38 PM
Gary - thanks for the link.

That was a good overview -  interesting that the 2001 tested with about 110hp, where the '97 they tested put out 100hp --- 10hp is a lot to gain.
Title: Shifting
Post by: gearset01 on March 30, 2006, 08:17:23 PM
Looks like 9 grand is the sweet spot for shifting.
 :motorsmile:

PIN
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: curiousmike on March 30, 2006, 08:38:16 PM
From both dyno-charts (97 and 01), you can see that 8k-9k is your point of diminishing returns for torque and power.
Title: Charts
Post by: gearset01 on March 30, 2006, 08:48:26 PM
Dont know much about reading those charts, it looked like you should hold it till it started to drop off is that not the case ??
Do you only stay in it till the upwards curve starts to go lateral ??
PIN
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: curiousmike on March 30, 2006, 09:13:40 PM
For racing, you'd want to go over the 9k mark to almost redline, because shifting to the next gear would put you back in the power.

If you shift at 9k, it'll put you lower in the rev range and not at the max power for the next gear.

On the street for "typical" riding, it's moot.  
Knowing that 9k is max power and you're not getting more is useful just in the sense that you don't need to beat the bike to 11k all the time.

OK, I'm rambling.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: Red01 on March 31, 2006, 11:21:29 AM
Quote from: "GaryB12VA"
This is one of the best comparo's I've seen between 1st and 2nd Generation Bandits. Not too technical but a good comparison. This article was one of the reasons I traded my 2000 Bandit for the 2002.

http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mcsuz/01b12.html


The only thing I could find wrong with the article is it would have you believe the 2G got two new cams. It only got a new exhaust cam. The intake cam is the same.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: FrankB12 on April 01, 2006, 02:39:48 PM
The dyno chart comparing '97 and '01 Bandit 1200's were from two articles, and dyno'd on different days.  That 110 hp figure for the second generation looks a little optimistic to me (and I own one).  In reality, they are very close in performance and simply adding a jet kit, GSXR cams, or an aftermarket piston kit would give you an 'affordable land missile' in the case of either.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: KX5000 on April 02, 2006, 01:10:17 AM
It's funny, I didn't know how terrible my Bandit was 'til I read the article comparing it to a gpz1100. I guess I must've been dropped on my head as a child, I love everthing about my bandit! :motorsmile:
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: Red01 on April 03, 2006, 10:27:07 AM
Quote from: "FrankB12"
The dyno chart comparing '97 and '01 Bandit 1200's were from two articles, and dyno'd on different days.  That 110 hp figure for the second generation looks a little optimistic to me (and I own one).  In reality, they are very close in performance and simply adding a jet kit, GSXR cams, or an aftermarket piston kit would give you an 'affordable land missile' in the case of either.


TRUE! I'd say there's no real difference in power between the two. Not any more than you'd find in dynoing any two same model bikes from the same year. ~100 RWHP is the norm for either Gen - and I assume the 3G is no different.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: curiousmike on April 03, 2006, 02:08:12 PM
Err... I'm still coming up to speed on my bandit lingo.

I assume
1G = '97-2000
2G = 01-05

Is there a 3G?
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: Red01 on April 03, 2006, 03:08:34 PM
G = Generation

For the 1200 it's:
1G = 1997-2000
2G = 2001-2005
3G = 2006- (not available in the USA)

For the 600, everything is a year earlier:
1G = 1996-1999
2G = 2000-2004
3G = 2005- (these are 650's - and not in the USA)
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: Bob Holland on April 03, 2006, 04:38:34 PM
With Suzuki not bringing the Bandit to the U.S. market, if I were to get a new bike, I would get the Kawaski ZRX 12, if it is still available, it is close to a Bandit.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: Red01 on April 03, 2006, 05:22:19 PM
No ZRX in the US for 2006 either. They do still offer the Z1.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: rider123 on April 03, 2006, 06:23:00 PM
On that bandit shootout article in the UK most 2G's get around 105 on the dyno. Some dyno 102.8 for example and some 107. The 1G's get around 98.
Title: Succinct synopsis of 97-00 1200's compared to 01-05 1200's?
Post by: smooth operator on April 04, 2006, 06:51:18 AM
I would imagine there would be differences from one dyno to another as far as what the read out you get. But it doesn't take much to bump that up.My 98 when it only had a D&D can,K&N filter,1 up in the mains dynoed @115rear wheel hp/77.5lbs of torque. I have no idea where its at now with the full exhaust,pods,cams addv.,and carbs jetted up.