Author Topic: 170 instead of 160?  (Read 2741 times)

Offline DjVas

  • TURBO TYPER!
  • **
  • Posts: 44
170 instead of 160?
« on: February 23, 2007, 04:20:32 PM »
Hey guys,

aksed that before but never got an answer. So can I put a 170 or wider rear tire instead of the 160 factory size? What are the issues? How wide can I go?

THANKS!

Offline 2005B12S

  • Board Homesteader!
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
170 instead of 160?
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2007, 12:07:05 AM »
2005 GSF1200SZ
1983 GS750ED
1992 900SS

"The quality of the kite matters little, sucess depends upon the man sitting in it" Manfred Von Richthofen

Offline pmackie

  • Site Supporters
  • Board Homesteader!
  • ***
  • Posts: 1149
170 instead of 160?
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2007, 12:16:34 AM »
Assuming you have a 2nd gen 600, the factory rim size is 4.5" and uses a 160/60ZR17 tire. A review of Bridgestones site (OEM tire was a BT56) lists the suggested and acceptable rims sizes as:

160 - 4.5 (4.25 - 5.0)
170 - 5.0 (4.25 - 5.5)

So, the 170 is OK on the 4.5 rim, but the rim is smaller than suggested. This will cause a slightly sharper profile which will pull in a slight bit of the width. At the end of it all, you will end up with a slightly taller and wider rear tire, but not overly obvious.

So...if your doing it for image reasons, I'm not sure you will notice much difference, but it will be a little wider. The difference should not be enough to cause clearance problems with the chain.

To go any wider, you will need a difference rear rim/sprocket arrangement. I assume you can swap in a Bandit 1200 swingarm and rear wheel, but some else here may able to confirm.
Paul
2002-GSF600S, Progressive Fork Springs, B12 Shock,
SS Brake lines, EBC HH pads, Leo Vince Ex & Kappa bags.
Ex Bike Mechanic (late 70's), somewhat rusty
32 years in the Fuel/lubes industry(Retired)

Offline DjVas

  • TURBO TYPER!
  • **
  • Posts: 44
170 instead of 160?
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2007, 12:00:14 AM »
thanks guys! I think it's clear!