I think Suzuki totally blew it with the SV1K... they already had the TL-R & TL-S, which were pretty good except for the funky rear shock the magazines always complained about, so what do they do with it when they update to the SV? They "fix" the rear shock by putting a so-so conventional shock on it, but drop the TL's better front end and detune the motor (even from the TL-S spec). I think many were hoping for the SV1K to be an improvement on the TL's and have friendlier ergos in at least one version, which even the naked one didn't do well. The downgrading of power & hardware was a disappointment. It's still a good bike, but it could have been so much more...
The FZ
is peakier than the B12, but it is still a pretty tractable unit.
Go to
Holeshot's site and look at FZ1 dyno charts and you can see for yourself.
Honda still has the $8399 919, too.
As for the FJR's heat issues, that's supposedly fixed with the '06, but even on the older ones, it seemed like not everyone complained, so it could be where they ride or their sensitivity to heat (and the Honda ST13 is just as bad, or worse). Since I live in the temperate Pacific Northwest and don't do a lot of riding in hot, arid places, I think I could deal with a little warm air on my legs - and in the cooler months, this could be a plus, not a minus.
Now if Suzuki tweaked the B12 a little harder and say added EFI, another point or two of compression & hotter cams they'd have a more competitive bike with the new FZ - and if they added a shaft final drive, full fairing and hard bags, they'd have a low budget FJR fighter (and I'd be very interested in that). Suzuki already has a reputation as having the best EFI in the m/c biz, so it shouldn't be hard to adapt something to the B12, and they've got the parts already in the bins for a shafty.